Like immigration, politics knows no borders and the battle in Arizona is
expected to complicate the already confused fight over the issue that crosses
partisan political boundaries.
By signing the Arizona bill, Republican Gov. Jan Brewer has
further pushed the issue of how to deal with illegal immigrants to the
forefront.
And it is unclear which side benefits: those seeking immigration overhaul or
those who would like the issue to go away, especially in this midterm election
year.
The Arizona bill gives police broader powers to stop people and ask for
identification. The law pits Arizona against the federal government in two
ways.
First, it could be a direct challenge to the individualfs civil rights. How
can an officer make a reasonable decision to stop someone without running the
risk of imposing on a legal resident or citizen?
Secondly, it challenges the limits of what a state can do and what the
federal government should be doing.
gIndeed, our failure to act responsibly at the federal level will only open
the door to irresponsibility by others,h Obama said at a naturalization ceremony
for those serving in the military. gThat includes, for example, the recent
efforts in Arizona, which threatened to....
... undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as
Americans, as well as the trust between police and their communities that is so
crucial to keeping us safe.h
Obama said he had ginstructed members of my administration to closely monitor
the situation and examine the civil rights and other implications of this
legislation.h That would imply that his administration would be ready to act in
any of the expected civil rights suits likely when the law goes into
practice.
But the president signaled that the issue is broader, going to the question
of who determines border policy, a state or the federal government.
The lead federal agency on border issues is the Department of Homeland
Security, headed by Secretary Janet Napolitano, a former
Democratic Arizona governor who twice vetoed legislation similar to the bill
signed Friday.
The department, does not comment on specific state legislation, but the
federal policy has been clear.
The federal government does not want a patchwork of differing state laws on
immigration and wants a comprehensive solution.
The federal government has also concentrated its efforts in fighting
criminals, strengthening border security, and on fugitives, rather than the
undocumented worker who could be seen as the target in the Arizona law.
gDHS continues to focus on smart, effective immigration enforcement that
places priority on those dangerous criminal aliens who present the greatest risk
to the security of our communities, on employers who continue to drive illegal
immigration by knowingly hiring undocumented workers, and by surging law
enforcement resources at the Southwest border,h a DHS spokesman said by
e-mail.
gIf we continue to fail to act at a federal level, we will continue to see
misguided efforts opening up around the country,h Obama said, pointing to
Arizona. gAs a nation, as a people, we can choose a different future -- a future
that keeps faith with our history, with our heritage, and with the hope that
America has always inspired in the hearts of people all over the world.h
But that requires a political solution, always a problem in an election year,
especially now when partisanship has so poisoned the legislative air in
Washington.
Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said her chamber
will not act on an immigration overhaul until the Senate first moves, a
recognition of the tough vote. Some Democrats in the House are still smarting at
how the healthcare battle played out, with the House having to go out on a limb
only to be stuck with a more conservative bill. They would like to avoid a
repeat over immigration.
In the Senate, New York Democrat Charles Schumer and
Republican Lindsey Graham have been working on a bipartisan
bill, but it is unclear whether there is enough time or will to bring it up
before the elections.
Immigration reform is unlike financial regulation reform, on which Democrats
and Republicans can find some common ground because there is a common enemy,
greedy Wall Street bankers and traders. On immigration there is no common enemy
to unite those more used to sparring than speaking.
gIfll continue to consult with Democrats and Republicans in Congress, and I
would note that 11 current Republican Senators voted to pass immigration reform
four years ago. Ifm hopeful that they will join with Democrats in doing so again
so we can make the progress the American people deserve,h Obama said.
Of course, one of the leading Republicans who pushed for immigration reform
was Arizona Sen. John McCain, Obamafs opponent in the
presidential race. McCain faces a tough primary from a candidate even more
conservative than he is. McCain has said he supports the Arizona bill.
--Michael Muskal